The JFK Assassination 54 Years Later: Mujahid Kamran

The JFK Assassination 54 Years Later

Mujahid Kamran

22 November, 2017

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/11/22/kamran-jfk/

I speak of peace because of the new face of war. Total war makes no sense in an age when great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to those forces. It makes no sense in an age when a single nuclear weapon contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by the allied air forces in the second World War. It makes no sense in an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations yet unborn.

John F. Kennedy, U.N. address, June 10, 1963

 

The assassination of the highly popular and visionary American president John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963, in Dallas Texas, was an event that instantly changed the trajectory of global politics in the wrong direction. At the time of his assassination he was seeking disengagement from Vietnam, was working for a rapprochement with the Soviet Union, was blocking the illegal and hidden Israeli nuclear program, was trying to get the Treasury to issue the dollar bills in place of the unconstitutional notes issued by the privately owned Federal Reserve, and wanted to share information on UFOs with the Soviet Union.  All these efforts essentially challenged the Satanic program of the Illuminati masonic international bankers who want to set up a global slave state after repeatedly bringing nations to war, destroying them, keeping them in debt bondage and bleeding and exhausting mankind while reducing global population violently.  Every major initiative for world peace and cooperation that JFK undertook, was undone after his assassination.

VIETNAM

Disengagement from Vietnam meant that JFK was undoing a plan that had been put into motion by the Secret Elite, the High Cabal, in the closing phases of World War II. As narrated by Col. L. Fletcher Prouty in his book, it was on September 2, 1945, when Japan had formally surrendered to the U.S., that he found out about the shipment of massive equipment from Okinawa to Korea and to Indochina [1]. This equipment was ostensibly meant for a 500,000-man assault on mainland Japan from Okinawa island. The use of the atomic bomb made this assault unnecessary and the equipment became redundant. It is quite possible that the Secret Elite already knew that this equipment would not be needed and intended it for another hideous purpose. Half of that equipment went to Korea and was, a few years later, used in the Korean war. The other half was sent to Indochina where it was received by Ho Chi Minh and General Giap at Haiphong harbour. It was used to defeat the French at Dien Bein Phu with secret American help in 1954.

Mysteriously Vietnam was divided into two parts at Geneva in 1954, North and South with separate regimes. Allen Dulles, the CIA director who worked as a Wall Street lawyer and was an agent of the High Cabal, promoted conflict in Vietnam in collusion with his brother, the Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, in complete defiance of the desire of President Eisenhower to keep out of Indochina. Both brothers were loyal and steadfast agents of the Elite and were loyal to the goals of the Elite, not the United States of America. The CIA (established 1947) promoted strife and bloodshed and confusion in Vietnam. Allen Dulles set up a Saigon Military Mission to help the French with Col. Edward Lansdale in it, the same Lansdale who was seen at the scene of JFKs murder in Dallas, Texas. But in reality it had a different mission. Col. Prouty writes [2]:

The Saigon Military Mission entered Vietnam clandestinely to assist the Vietnamese, rather than the French. . . As members of that team understood their orders, they were to wage paramilitary operations against the enemy and to carry out psychological warfare. . . They were a band of superterrorists . . . They saw their role as promoting sabotage, subversion, labour strikes, armed uprisings, and guerrilla warfare.”

CIA remained active in Vietnam leading to a civil war situation and the consequent involvement of U.S. military advisers. The military industry, owned by the High Cabal and its subservient allies, was looking forward to greater military involvement in Vietnam with its profit and Malthusian motives, when JFK ordered withdrawal of military advisers from Vietnam. This was a bolt out of the blue and was utterly unacceptable for the Illuminati masonic international bankers. After JFK’s elimination, the first order passed by his successor LBJ, was the reversal of the decision to withdraw military advisors from Vietnam. LBJ gave the international banking families the war in Indochina that had been planned in the dying days of WW II. They were able to massacre millions of people and hundreds of billions of dollars in profit as a result.

BAY OF PIGS FIASCO

The anger of the High Cabal against JFK had been building ever since the Bay of Pig fiasco. The real reason for the failure of Bay of Pigs was simple: it could not succeed without complete destruction of the Cuban air force. The Cuban air force had a total of ten T-33 aircraft, 7 of which were destroyed, on April 15, 1961, two days before the planned “invasion”, by refugee pilots flying out of Nicaragua in CIA supplied B 26 bombers. On the morning of the raid (April 17) these 3 remaining aircraft were to be destroyed in an air attack by rebel pilots trained by the Americans, prior to landing by the ground force of the rebels.  Shortly before the aircraft were to take off (at 1.00 a.m.) from Nicaragua, the CIA Deputy Director Gen. Cabell mysteriously cancelled the raid despite the fact that it was allowed formally by JFK twelve hours earlier. No permission from the president was sought for this cancellation, nor was he informed [3].

Mysteriously Allen Dulles was out of country during these dates. He had gone abroad to address young entrepreneurs!  This was of course by design. He had, as Director CIA, planned the invasion well in advance, before JFK was even elected. When the Cuban air force was bombing the rebel forces the American military leadership put full pressure on JFK to allow them to get involved. The Cuban T-33s not only wrought havoc with the “invading” forces, they also brought down fifteen B-26’s! JFK, most courageously, refused this illegality. Thus the CIA operatives not only succeeded in dividing a wedge between JFK and the military, they also embarrassed JFK globally in addition to building anger against him among Cuban refugees in U.S. JFK had assumed power less than three months earlier, on January 20, 1961. Cabell was later involved in the JFK assassination.  His brother was the Mayor of Dallas when JFK was assassinated.

A 300 page CIA document released in 2005, confirms that CIA went ahead despite knowing that without the support of the U.S. armed forces the brigade of exiles would be doomed [4]. This assessment was concealed from JFK who was, in a sense, set up and trapped into a very difficult situation. Their calculation presumably was that once the situation for the exile brigade became grave, JFK would succumb to pressure from the military and the CIA. They had miscalculated, and had underestimated JFK’s strength. The meeting at the White House, during which JFK was pressured by the military leadership and the CIA to allow U.S. military involvement, lasted three hours! JFK told the meeting that he had told the Bissell, the CIA officer and Admiral Edmund Burke “over and over again” that he will not involve U.S. combat forces to save the operation.

James Douglass has provided evidence that Dulles et al did indeed wish to trap JFK into agreeing to direct U.S. military involvement in Bay of Pigs. He quotes from private papers of Allen Dulles, that were made available after his death. In his own handwriting Dulles wrote something which shows that he was aware that the mission would fail unless military involvement is permitted and hoped that it would be. He wrote [5]:

[We] did not want to raise these issues – in [an undecipherable word] discussion – which might harden the decision against the type of action we required. We felt when the chips were down – when the crisis arose in reality, any action required for success would be authorized rather than permit the enterprise to fail.”

JFK had been in office for a mere three months when this crisis was heaped upon him and he had stood his ground. A subsequent inquiry led JFK to eventually remove CIA Director Allen Dulles, Charles Bissell and Deputy Director General Cabell. Col. Prouty quotes JFK’s friend Justice Douglas [6]:

This episode seared him. He had experienced the extreme power these groups had, these various insidious influences of the CIA and the Pentagon, on civilian policy, and I think it raised in his mind the spectre: Can Jack Kennedy, President of the United States, ever be strong enough to really rule these two powerful agencies? I think it had profound effect . . . it shook him up!

No wonder JFK was so infuriated that he said that he will “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” Three months on into his presidency JFK had a face-off with the CIA and the Pentagon, at whose back stood their controllers, the cabal of Illuminati international bankers.

CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS

After the Bay of Pigs fiasco JFK faced another highly dangerous crisis in Cuba. This was the discovery of Russian short and medium range nuclear missiles on Cuban soil. The information was conveyed to JFK on October 16, 1962 by his adviser McGeorge Bundy. The information was based on analysis of photographic data provided by the famous U2 spy plane. This was a very grave situation and the U.S. military immediately went into attack mode. They were continually pressuring JFK to go to war.

Why were the Russian missiles installed in Cuba? Castro explained this to the French journalist Jean Daniel, who was also JFK’s secret envoy, in the following words in 1963 (in fact Castro and Daniel were conversing when the news of JFK’s assassination was telecast) [7]:

Six months before these missiles were installed in Cuba, we had received an accumulation of information warning us that a new invasion of the island was being prepared under the sponsorship of the Central Intelligence Agency, whose administrators were humiliated by the Bay of Pigs disaster and by the spectacle of being ridiculed in the eyes of the world and berated by the U.S. government circles.”

Castro was referring to Operation Mongoose which aimed at overthrowing his government and which had been prepared the C.I.A. and approved by JFK. He was saying that the missiles were installed in order to counter Operation Mongoose.

David Talbot, who was given access to White House records pertaining to this crisis, describes the exchange between the military leadership and JFK during a meeting at the White House held on October 19, 1962 [8]. The military leaders, particularly Air Force Chief Curtis LeMay, insulted JFK in an attempt to coerce him to allow them to attack Cuba. Unknown to JFK the generals had moved troops and ships to locations from where they could attack Cuba quickly. When the meeting ended and JFK left the room the military leaders used highly derogatory language against him. They did not know what they said was being recorded. After the meeting JFK told one of his aides that: “The brass have one advantage. If we listen to them, and do what they want us to do, none of us will be alive later to tell them that they were wrong.” JFK could stand his ground not only because of his superior intellect but also because he had fought very courageously during WW II, apart from losing his brother in the war.

The U.S. military and its allies were determined to attack Cuba. Tommy Power, right hand man of Air Chief General LeMay had, on his own, raised the DEFCON level to level 2 without the President’s permission and knowledge. There are 5 DEFCON levels; level 1 is red and stands for nuclear war, level 2 is orange and stands for a very high chance of nuclear war.  The US air force had made preparations for a nuclear attack. The raising of DEFCON level to level 2 must have been in the notice of the Russians, who were bound to take counter measures. Curtis LeMay wanted to “fry”  Cuba!  When JFK asked him what would the Russians do in response to an attack on Cuban soil leading o Russian casualties, LeMay replied that the Russians would do “nothing”.  JFK, who had a better comprehension of the global chessboard, pointed out that the Russians could respond to their casualties in Germany instead of Cuba.  JFK, well aware of the horrors of nuclear war, went for the “quarantine” option, blocking Russian ships from entering Cuba and checking every ship that was carrying cargo to Cuba. This was much to the dismay of the generals and the High Cabal.

On October 27 an American U2 plane was shot down over Cuba by the Soviets raising the American military temperatures to dangerously high levels since the pilot was killed. The generals demanded a quick retaliatory response. Based on his reading of the White House records, David Talbot points out that JFK’s advisers were worried about the stability of the regime and felt that the longer the crisis lingered the greater the chances of instability. At this point JFK asked his brother Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) to visit Anatoly Dobrynin, the Soviet ambassador.  RFK met Dobrynin on the same day, October 27th. David Talbot quotes from the report Dobrynin sent to Khrushchev [9]:

Robert Kennedy looked exhausted. One could see from his eyes that he had not slept for days. He himself said that he had not been home for six days and six nights. ‘The president is in a grave situation,’ Robert Kennedy said, ‘and he does not know how to get out of it. We are under very heavy stress. In fact, we are under pressure from our military to use force against Cuba. . . President Kennedy implores Chairman Khrushchev to accept his offer and to take into consideration the peculiarities of the American system. Even though the president himself is very much against starting a war over Cuba, an irreversible chain of events could occur against his will . . . If the situation continues much longer, the president is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power. The American army could get out of control.”

Khrushchev also sensed that the military could stage a coup and destabilize America and precipitate war. He turned to Andrei Gromyko and said [10], “We have to let Kennedy know that we want to help him. Yes, help. We now have a common cause, to save the world from those pushing us toward war.”  Who was pushing the two powers to war? The Satanic international bankers, the Satanic High Cabal. Khrushchev therefore, very wisely, agreed to dismantle Soviet missiles in Cuba in return for a commitment from the U.S. never to attack Cuba. As a secret part of the deal JFK also agreed to remove U.S. Jupiter missiles from Turkey after a gap. They were removed six months later.  Thus JFK and Khrushchev averted a possible nuclear war, much to the chagrin of the Satanic High Cabal, the coterie of Illuminati masonic international bankers and their subservient allies.

PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE WITH RUSSIA

After the close call during the Cuban missile crisis, JFK came to the conclusion that U.S. and the Soviet Union should move towards peaceful coexistence and create a world free from the danger of nuclear war.  He had been on this path from the start of his presidency. As Khrushchev was to write: “In a nuclear war those who survive will envy the dead.” The Cuban crisis had brought JFK and Khrushchev quite close. In fact, soon after becoming President, JFK took a decision that sent a positive signal to the Soviet leadership. On March 23, 1961, barely two months in office, JFK overruled his military and intelligence leadership to issue a statement in favour of a neutral Laos. He stated at a press conference that the U.S. supported the goal of a neutral Laos “strongly and unreservedly.”  He thus withdrew support for a military ruler, an “anti-communist”, in Laos who had been installed by the CIA and Pentagon. He also expressed the willingness of the U.S. to join an international conference in Laos.  On June 3-4, 1961 Kennedy and Khrushchev met at a summit meeting in Vienna and agreed to move towards an independent and neutral Laos. This was the only issue on which they agreed but it was a beginning.

Those working for a pre-planned war in Indochina must have been utterly dismayed by their young president when he refused to commit U.S. troops in Cuba in April 1961 during the Bay of Pigs fiasco. The High Cabal and its agents wanted a state of confrontation and tension between the U.S. and the Soviet Union and were bent upon thwarting all moves towards a genuinely peaceful co-existence. Therefore, their loyal and steadfast agent Allen Dulles, a 33rd degree Freemason, the wily and crooked CIA Director, and his Pentagon brethren presented a plan for attacking the Soviet Union in “late 1963 after a period of heightened tensions.” This plan was presented at the National Security Council meeting of July 20, 1961, a mere month and a half after there had been agreement between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. for a neutral Laos [11]. It had come out of nowhere. What was the purpose of this senseless proposal? It was the destruction of any attempts at a peaceful co-existence. JFK was so infuriated by this heinous proposal that he walked out of the meeting remaking to Dean Rusk, his Secretary of State: “And we call ourselves the human race.”

Whether or not the Soviet leadership was aware of the proposal to attack them they resumed testing of atmospheric thermonuclear weapons the following month. On August 30, 1961 the Soviet Union exploded a 150 kiloton hydrogen bomb over Siberia.  In the following days the Soviet Union tested wo more bombs forcing JFK to announce, on September 5, 1961, the resumption of nuclear tests by the U.S. This was indeed a serious setback to JFK’s desire for disarmament. However, both Krushchev and JFK had to contend with their military establishments as they groped their way forward in an uncertain situation.

JFK addressed the U.N.  on September 25, 1961, on the subject of disarmament. He stated on this Illuminati international banker created world forum [12]:

The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us. . . It is therefore our intention to challenge the Soviet Union, not to an arms race, but to a peace race – to advance together step by step, stage by stage, until general and complete disarmament has been achieved.”

He also stated that “disarmaments negotiations resume promptly, and continue without interruption until an entire program for general and complete disarmament has not only been agreed but has actually been achieved.” He concluded his speech with the following remarks: “Together we shall save our planet, or together we shall perish in its flames. Save it we can and save it we must-and then we shall earn the eternal thanks of mankind.”  How dare he utter a genuine desire for genuine disarmament and peace on a forum created by those who wanted a one world slave state after repeated holocausts? Illuminati international bankers. The U.N. forum was not designed for peace by those who created it but was meant for imposing the Satanic will of the High Cabal. The Illuminati masonic Zionist international banking cabal was certainly deeply disturbed and their disturbance would manifest itself in different ways at different stages throughout JFK’s years in office. The international banking cabal and the Illuminati philosophy stood for a war ravaged planet with tens of millions of dead and not for complete or partial disarmament. That is where we are headed now in 2017.

JFK’s U.N. speech provoked a response from Khrushchev who had by now sensed that JFK wanted genuine peace and that unlike his predecessors he was not an agent of those who stood for war. From the shores of Black Sea Khrushchev wrote a 26-page personal letter that was apparently kept secret from his own military and foreign office and was delivered by an intelligence agent to JFK’s press secretary Pierre Salinger. The letter had been wrapped in a newspaper and was dated September 29, 1961 i.e. it was written four days after JFK’s U.N. speech.  The most significant part of the letter was the one referring to their joint responsibility for peace. Khrushchev compared the globe with [13]:

Noah’s Ark where both the ‘clean’ and the ‘unclean’ found sanctuary. But regardless of who lists himself with the ‘clean’ and who is considered to be ‘unclean,’ they are all equally interested in one thing and that is that the Ark should successfully continue its cruise. And we have no other alternative: either we should live in peace and cooperation so that the Ark maintains its buoyancy, or else it sinks.”

JFK replied to Khrushchev’s letter on October 16, 1961 expressing his deep liking for the Noah’s Ark analogy.  He thanked Khrushchev for initiating the correspondence and agreed to keep quiet about it. He wrote further [14]: “Whatever our differences, our collaboration to keep the peace is as urgent – if not more urgent – than our collaboration to win the last war. They corresponded secretly for almost a year but their differences remained unresolved. Khrushchev was dismayed by the approval of Operation Mongoose (on November 30, 1961) by JFK, who in turn was disturbed to discover the presence of Russian missiles on Cuban soil. Eight days before approving Operation Mongoose JFK had, while refusing to commit troops in Vietnam, agreed to send military advisers and support units to the region. He had probably not yet realised that Vietnam was another trap, or he was, perhaps, adjusting to the pressure of his military leadership and the CIA.

Despite these developments back and forth the missile crisis brought JFK and Khruschev closer. Around the same time the American generals, the CIA, and its masters, the Satanic Illuminati bankers, realised that they could not deal with JFK except by getting rid of him. Some of generals must have regarded him a traitor, others a weakling. For example, the air chief General Curtis LeMay called JFK’s decision not to attack Cuba “the greatest defeat in our history.”  He also added [15], “We had a chance to throw the Communists out of Cuba. But the administration was scared to death [the Russians] might shoot a missile at us.” The perception that JFK should be eliminated grew more firm when the Elite realised that JFK had become very popular and would win the next election and was going to take the U.S. out of Vietnam. The loss of profits and the murder of millions they could not afford to let go.

The CIA leadership and sections of the Army had turned rogue while JFK was exploring accommodation with Russia and as part of his efforts for a peaceful world, with Cuba as well. They had set up various groups of Cuban revolutionaries such as Alpha 66 and DRE. These groups were being run by CIA officer David Attlee Phillips under the pseudonym Maurice Bishop. These groups began attacking Russians within Cuba as well as Soviet ships in Cuban seas or open waters leading to loss of Soviet life. This was a very grave matter. Peter Dale Scott writes [16]:

Alpha 66 was violently anti-Kennedy in 1963. With the active support of Henry Luce and Time-Life, which is said to have spent a quarter of a million dollars, Alpha 66 made it a point of attacking Russian targets in Cuba in an attempt to shatter the growing convergence of U.S. and Soviet policies in the Caribbean after the nuclear scare of the 1962 missile crisis. When the President appealed separately to Luce and the exiles to cease their attacks both rebuffed him. Alpha 66 team leader Tony Veciana ‘publicly snubbed the President and said that Alpha 66 would continue. If anything the activities of Alpha 66 were stepped up.’”

To snub the president of the United States publicly was no small matter. The involvement of Luce indicated that the secret society leadership, i.e. the satanic international bankers were encouraging and supporting this. And at least some section or sections of the Army had turned rogue too.  When the Soviets protested JFK decided to put an end to these activities. On March 31, 1963, the Justice Department, headed by his brother RFK, imposed restrictions on the movements of rebel leaders involved and confiscated boats used in these raids.  JFK also wrote to Khrushchev on April 11, 1963 [17]:

The efforts of this government to reduce tensions have, as you know, aroused much criticism from certain quarters in this country. But neither such criticism nor the opposition of any sector of our society will be allowed to determine the policies of this Government. In particular I have neither the intention nor the desire to invade Cuba. . .”

The rogue elements still persisted. Peter Dale Scott writes further [18]:

Through 1963 there were reports that the nuisance raids of Alpha 66, despite Kennedy’s disapproval, were being tolerated (against orders) by middle-level ranks of the U.S. Navy. Indeed it seems likely that at the same time Alpha 66 was being used operationally by the U.S. Army.”

JFK’s action to stop activities of the Cuban rebels generated intense resentment among them. CIA was able to exploit this resentment in the JFK assassination plot. Ironically Tony Veciana, considered JFK a traitor in 1963. But he was subsequently able to see through the CIA plot and revised his opinion about JFK. He told the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1977 that he had seen David Attlee Phillips talking to Lee Harvey Oswald, the patsy blamed for the assassination of JFK. In 1979 Veciana survived an assassination attempt – he was shot in the head. Thereafter he stayed silent for a long time. But in 2013 he stated [19]:

In reality what happened that day [November 22, 1963] was a coup de ’etat. President Kennedy’s death was the result of a conspiracy planned by CIA operatives supported by a handful of high-ranking military officers and members of the mafia. They believed that President Kennedy was a traitor who had jeopardised national security by establishing a foreign policy of dialogue and conciliation with traditional enemies of the United States.”

Veciana also stated that it was only later that he realised that “JFK was a great man and a great President who had great vision for this country and the world.” In 2013 Veciana was 86 and said that he could not leave the world without paying this tribute to JFK!

CLASH WITH WALL STREET

The Satanic international bankers had come to realise that JFK was all out for the masses, wanted to eliminate poverty, respected smaller nations, and did not view the bankers favourably. He had demonstrated his courage, speed and absolute commitment to the masses when he ferociously countered an increase in steel prices by the steel industry during April 1962. The steel industry had, quite arrogantly, raised steel prices in violation of an agreement with JFK and the workers unions, not to raise prices. Within days JFK had brought the international-banker connected steel industry on its knees. The steel industry abjectly withdrew the price increase

The bigger steel companies were owned by the international bankers. For instance, the biggest of them all, the United States Steel Company, involved top level men from Morgan Guaranty Trust, First National City Bank of New York, Prudential Insurance Company, etc. The displeasure of the Illuminati international bankers was evident when JFK went to address the American Business Council. The American Business Council involved men who were a few tiers below the international bankers and were employed by them. JFK told his adviser Ted Soresnsen that the American Business Council was the only gathering that he had addressed that “did not rise to its feet upon the entrance of the President of the United States.” The international bankers were sending a signal to JFK that they did not respect him. As James Douglass writes [20]: “The steel crisis defined John and Robert Kennedy as Wall Street enemies. . . U.S. News and the World gave prominence in its April 30, 1962, issue to an anti-Kennedy article on ‘Planned Economy’ that suggested that the president was acting like a Soviet commissar.”  The writer and the editors seemed to have forgotten that the Bolshevik Revolution was funded and instigated and brought about by the very same Satanic dialectical international banking families for whose sake they were attacking JFK.

In fact, the international bankers were trying to bring down JFK by defaming him in the media.  Time, Life, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, and other media outlets continually criticized JFK. Henry Luce, the owner of Time, Life and Fortune magazines was a member of the Order of Skull and Bones, a known Illuminati secret society at Yale. Six out of fourteen directors of Time were members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Walter S. Beebe, Chairman of Newsweek and Washington Post, was a CFR member and a close friend of the loyal and steadfast Elite agent John Foster Dulles who had been sacked by JFK. At the time Dulles was the senior most CFR director. Donald Gibson points out that during JFK’s time, in just three and a half years, the GDP rose from $500 billion to $600 billion, industrial production increased by 22% and personal income by 15% [21]. Yet the Elite controlled media gave the impression that JFK was “anti-business”. The media was not speaking for the business community; it was speaking for those who wanted a complete monopoly in business instead of fair competition.  As Donald Gibson wrote [22]:

The Lucepress, the Wall Street Journal, and Newsweek hammered at President Kennedy’s policies, condemning specific policies as well as Kennedy’s use of presidential powers to shape the economy. In doing so, they spoke not for the country nor for business in general, but for highly concentrated economic power organised around America’s leading financial institutions. They were not defending competition and freeplay of entrepreneurship, but were rather engaging in a conflict with Kennedy over whether it would be private or public power that moulded the future.  The interests of old money, of status and privilege, came into confrontation with the most direct expression of a democratic republic – an elected and popular president acting on behalf of the nation’s interest. Actually, these publications were more than just mouthpieces for financial groups and oligopolistic oil companies, they were part of network of families and institutions that are at the very top of what is generally called the Establishment.

The very top of the Establishment comprises of none other than the Satanic international banking families, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, and so on.  The Illuminati international banking families were feeling the heat of JFK’s pro-people, pro-peace policies and hence David Rockefeller wrote a few letters to JFK criticising his policies. JFK replied to most of the criticisms and ignored some. However, Rockefeller leaked the letters he had written o JFK and these appeared in the July 1962 issue of Life magazine. This leakage showed the extent of heat that the Elite was feeling – one of its most conspicuous members had come out in the open to attack JFK.

THE ISRAEL FACTOR

The United States of America is run by agents of Illuminati international bankers who are all Zionists. The very mention of a possible Israeli involvement in the JFK assassination is to invite the charge of anti-Semitism without being anti-Semitic! The excessive and insincere use of the club of anti-Semitism has lost its appeal on a worldwide basis – it has become counterproductive. But one must look at what was going on between the Israeli government and JFK prior to his assassination and what happened to U.S. policy once JFK had been eliminated.  Congressman Paul Findley wrote in March 1992 in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs [23]: “It is interesting but not surprising that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s intelligence agency the Mossad has never been mentioned.

Now everyone who studies these matters knows that Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom. What was so special about the Rothschilds that Lord Balfour addressed the letter known as Balfour Declaration to a Rothschild? The Rothschilds and their Illuminati international banking brethren had a very direct role in the creation and control of Israel and in bringing about the Communist revolution in Russia, the so-called Bolshevik Revolution. Those who took over Palestine by force, through ruthless murder, received arms from the East European communist states.   As Douglass Reed wrote: “Conspiracy bred Communism and Zionism and these took the future of the West in a pincer-like clutch.” One of the reasons the Illuminati international bankers waged the two world wars was to create Israel.

JFK had a simple problem with Israel: his administration had found out that Israel was building a secret nuclear facility at Dimona and he wanted to ensure that it was to be used for peaceful purposes. He wanted thorough inspections of the secret Israeli nuclear facility. The Israelis were developing nuclear weapons and wanted to ensure that JFK would not stop them. The world now knows that Israel has nuclear weapons that were first developed at Dimona. So JFK was absolutely justified in his insistence that the Israeli nuclear program remain peaceful. None other than the Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld has stated [24]:

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them on targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force . . .. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.

It was several decades after JFK’s assassination in the early 1990s, that some of the correspondence between the Israeli government and JFK on the Dimona issue became public. What was so secret about this correspondence and why was it suppressed for so long? There was only one reason: had it been known at that time that JFK was trying to seriously stop Israel from going nuclear Mossad would have immediately been added to the list of suspects in the public mind. That had to be avoided at all costs. No wonder the first and only book that seemed to establish Israel as the “missing link” in the JFK assassination intrigue appeared within a couple of years of the opening up of the JFK-Ben Gurion correspondence on the Dimona issue. It was Michael Collin Piper’s book Final Judgement: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy that researched the Mossad role in the JFK assassination.  Piper paid with his life eventually for this book and for delving too deeply into Illuminati practices – he was found dead in a hotel room in May 2015.

The, thus far, revealed correspondence between Israeli government and JFK clearly shows that JFK had told Ben Gurion in very clear terms that if Israel did not come clean on the nuclear program the U.S. would withhold aid to Israel.  JFK wanted to stop nuclear proliferation at any cost. Nuclear weapons were his nightmare and he was determined to stop Israel from going nuclear.   Avner Cohen and William Burr posted an important article on April 21, 2016 in which they stated [25]:

President John F. Kennedy worried that Israel’s nuclear program was a potentially serious proliferation risk and insisted that Israel permit periodic inspections to mitigate the danger, according to declassified documents published today by the National Security Archive, Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, and the James Martin Centre for Non-Proliferation Studies.  Kennedy pressured the government of Ben Gurion to prevent a military nuclear program, particularly after stage managed tours of the Dimona facility for U.S. government scientists in 1961 and 1962 raised suspicions within U.S. intelligence that Israel might be concealing its underlying nuclear aims. Kennedy’s longtime objectives, documents show, was to broaden and institutionalize inspections of Dimona by International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Ben Gurion lied persistently about Israel’s nuclear intentions. So much so that JFK privately told Charles Bartlett: “The sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability.” This was an angry statement and a serious statement and the Israelis knew that as long as JFK was there they could not have their nuclear weapon. So Ben Gurion resigned on June 16, 1963. His resignation is attributed to his having approved JFK’s assassination. The resignation would absolve him of responsibility of Mossad action as he would no longer be in power.

District Attorney Jim Garrison had zeroed in on Clay Shaw as a possible suspect. In 1963 Shaw had served on the Board of a Rome based company named Permindex. It turned out that Permindex was a Mossad front company. Further the Geneva based Banque de Credit Internationale (BCI) was one of the owners of Permindex. This bank is known to have laundered money for the Jewish mob leader Meyer Lansky whose name also turned up in connection with the JFK assassination. BCI had been established by Tibor Rosenbaum known to be involved in financing Mossad and procuring arms for the agency. According to an Israeli biographer of Lansky, the mob leader, 90% of Israel’s arms purchases of the newly created state of Israel were carried out through BCI.  In fact, he has been mentioned as former Director of Finances and Supply for Mossad.

The major ownership of Permindex was with a company CMC (Centro Mondiale Commerciale)  of Rome which was owned by a Romanian Jew named George Mandel (he had changed his name to Giorgio Mantello)  who was known to have deep links with Mossad.  Piper quotes a Canadian researcher Michael Phillips who described Mandel as a “33rd degree Mason with closest connection to the highest diplomatic circles.”  So we have Mossad links all around Permindex and two names believed to be connected to the JFK assassination.  But a deeper surprise was brought by the Canadian researcher Maurice Phillipps. The CEO of Permindex was a man named Louis Bloomfeld. Writing on AFP, Michael Collins Piper stated in 2013 [26]:

Documents unearthed by the Canadian author Maurice Phillipps demonstrate beyond question that Shaw’s associate on the board of Permindex (its chief executive officer and primary shareholder) Louis Bloomfled of Montreal, was longtime attorney for the Rothschild dynasty, particularly for Baron Edmond de Rothschild of London, going as far back as World War II.”

Based on the research of Phillips, Piper adds that [27]:

Documents indicate Bloomfeld was so close to Rothschild that he (Bloomfeld) incorporated (in Canada) – and was a shareholder of –  Tri Continental Pipeline Ltd. (described by Phillipps as a ‘major Rothschild company’) to which Israel granted a 49-year exclusive right on the use of a 16-inch pipeline between Red Sea and Haifa in Israel.”

Piper has also pointed out that Bloomfeld and Montreal liquor baron Sam Bronfman, for a long time the head of the World Jewish Congress, “were among a clique of money kings who, in the 1950s, bankrolled Israel’s secret nuclear arms program.” So the suspect Clay Shaw, through Bloomfeld, CEO of Permindex, leads us to the heart of the Zionist Elite – the Rothschilds and the Bronfmans.

What is true of Clay Shaw is equally true of the mafia actors involved in the assassination. Jim Garrison had also held the Jewish mafia don Meyer Lansky complicit in the JFK assassination.  Piper writes [28]:

Robert Lacey points out in his biography of Lansky that Israeli agents were introduced to Lansky in the summer of 1948, the year that Israel became a state. Lansky permitted the Hagganah (Jewish terrorist underground) fund-raiser, Joseph Baum, to hold a $10,000 benefit (at Lansky’s gambling house), the Colonial Inn.  He gave a donation himself. Lansky told them: ‘I am at your service.’”

Lansky also provided other services to Israel. For instance, arm shipments for Palestinians were either thrown overboard by his men and also sometimes diverted to Israel. Lansky’s old ties with Israeli operatives are there beyond any doubt.  And Lansky went and settled in Israel once the JFK assassination had occurred and he became a suspect. Jack Rubinstein (Jack Ruby) who killed Oswald on November 24, 1963, two days after the JFK assassination was a Lansky man. Oswald was killed to prevent him from telling the truth about the JFK assassination. Is all of this a coincidence?

Piper has also mentioned that Menachim Begin, who eventually became a prime minister of Israel, was “overheard conspiring with Lansky’s California henchman, Mickey Cohen, in a conversation that suggested hostile intentions by Israel against the American President.” Begin, it may be recalled, was a commander of the Zionist terrorist organisation Irgun. Piper also points out that Yitzhak Shamir “headed the Mossad’s assassination squad at the time of JFK’s assassination.  A former French intelligence officer has charged that Shamir himself arranged the hiring of JFK’s actual assassins through a close ally in French intelligence.”   The senior CIA officer E. Howard Hunt did tell his son on his deathbed that there was a French assassin among JFK’s killers. Yitzhak Shamir had himself been a terrorist and was involved in the assassination of Lord Moyne who disagreed with the Zionists on Palestine. He was a part of the Irgun-Stern gang that murdered the U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte. He was also involved in the 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel in which 91 people were killed, was arrested and interned but escaped later. Frank Sturgis, who confessed to CIA asset Marita Lorenz that he was involved in the JFK assassination plot, was also a Mossad asset as pointed out by Piper.  Piper has further stated [29]:

Three top ‘Mafia’ figures – Sam Giancana and Johnny Rosselli of Chicago and Sante Trafficante Jr. of Tampa – were key figures in the CIA-Mob plots against Fidel Castro and often linked to the JFK assassination. Although the three Italian-American gangsters were major mob players, evidence shows that they also were – like Carlos Marcello – subordinates of Meyer Lansky. Amazing new evidence demonstrates Giancana (and Rosselli) were actively collaborating with the Mossad, essentially mere ‘front men’ for Meyer Lansky’s little-known Chicago partner-in-crime, Mossad connected Hyman Larner, the ‘real boss’ of the mob in the Windy City.”

Andrew Cockburn and Leslie Cockburn, both Jewish, have authored a book Dangerous Liaisons., dealing with the Mossad and CIA. In reply to a question regarding the rationale of the book during a TV interview, Andrew Cockburn stated [30]:

What we say, what we explain is that there has been since almost the earliest days of the Israeli state and the earliest days of the CIA a secret bond, basically by which Israeli intelligence did jobs for the CIA and the rest of the American intelligence. You can’t understand what’s been going on with American covert operations and the Israeli covert operations unless you understand this.”

Both the CIA and the state of Israel were created by the Illuminati-Satanic-Zionist international bankers, and work, above all for their interests. That is the deepest bond between them and it helps us understand the JFK assassination better.

One of the key men in the JFK assassination plot, apparently working for the CIA, was the mysterious Head of the counter-intelligence division, James Jesus Angleton. In an interview given to Project Camelot, John Lear the highly decorated pilot, an insider and the son of the inventor of the Lear jet, one of the most informed men about clandestine affairs, made the following statement about the role of Mossad in the JFK assassination [31]:

. . . when Israel became a state James Angleton was the chief of CIA in Rome; they got Angleton to Tel Aviv along with some guys from MI 6 to form Mossad. And somehow for some reason James Angleton got allied with Mossad like this (John Lear crosses his index finger with the middle finger placing it atop the middle finger). Forever he was the mole.  If you remember he was the head CIA Director of foreign Intelligence.  For he was the guy always looking for the mole. He was the Russian mole. He was so friends with Mossad he would tell Mossad stuff that they would pass on to Russia.

So when David Ben Gurion, in the summer of 1963, said: You know We will have to kill Kennedy, we have to. I am tired of him of threatening us with Dimona. It’s none of his friggin business. I don’t want to hear any more from Kennedy. You kill him. He gave that order to Mossad and then resigned so that he could not be held responsible for it. Mossad then went to Angleton. The Kennedy assassination was not a CIA job but it was greased by the CIA only because Angleton was there with his buddies from Mossad. And he was the one that greased everything from the skids for everything that happened in Dealey Plaza and the escape and everything. There were Corsican sharp shooters there, hired by Mossad. They pulled off the whole thing and everybody says: Oh, they think the mob killed Kennedy, or maybe Johnson did, or you know, Castro. It wasn’t. It was Israel. And the reason they did it because David Ben Gurion didn’t want any more inspections of Dimona. And that’s all.

Mordecai Vanunu, who first revealed the existence of the Israeli nuclear weapons program at Dimona, also revealed that Ben Gurion ordered the assassination of JFK because JFK opposed Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons and that there was a link between the JFK assassination and the 1967 Arab-Israeli war [32].

 What happened to U.S.-Israel relations once JFK had been eliminated?  This has been described in an article posted on www.john-f-kennedy.net on November 22, 2014. It states [33]:

If you are still not convinced how about some numbers? In Kennedy’s last fiscal year budget of 1964, Israeli aid was $40 million. In LBJ’s first budget of 1965, it soared to $71 million and in 1966 more than tripled from two years earlier to $130 million! Plus during Kennedy’s administration, almost none of our aid to Israel was military in nature. Instead, it was split equally between development loans and food assistance under PL 480 Program. Yet  in 1965 under the Johnson administration, 20% of our aid to Israel was military, while in 1966 71% was used for war related materials.

Can you see what’s happening here? Within two years of JFK’s assassination, Israel went from being a weak, outmatched member of a volatile Middle Eastern community that was not allowed to develop nuclear weapons to one that was well on its way to becoming an undeniable military force on the world stage. John Kenned adamantly put his foot down and refused to allow Israel to develop a nuclear program, while LBJ bent over backward to facilitate and bolster them. Or as Seymour Hersh wrote in the Samson Option, ‘By 1968, the president had no intention of doing anything to stop the bomb.’”

The article points out that in 1963 JFK sold only 5 Hawk missiles to Israel but as soon as JFK was assassinated the situation changed drastically.  In 1965-66 the LBJ administration gave 48 Skyhawk attack aircraft and 250 tanks in addition to guns and artillery, altering the balance of power drastically in favour of Israel.  This is what led to the Arb-Israeli war of 1967 in which Israel was the aggressor.

JFK, THE UFO ISSUE, AND MJ 12

Researchers have since long shown that UFOs exist and that the U.S. government has been reverse engineering UFO’s while denying their existence and carrying out a campaign of disinformation. The advent of the internet has established the UFO existence beyond doubt and many personnel involved secretly with UFO’s have recorded their testimony about UFO’s either on their death bed or otherwise.

About three decades ago the existence of the highly secret MJ 12 group was revealed. This group was set up as an independent entity empowered by the President of the United States to counter, and if required, eliminate any threats to UFO secrecy. Interestingly the UFO matters do not lie in the jurisdiction of the air force or the military. MJ 12 (Majestic 12) a 12-member super-secret group. In an interview given to Project Camelot, John Lear has also confirmed the existence of MJ 12, mentioning that he had information from three inside sources [34]. He cites Gen. Jimmy Doolittle, a highly respected American aviation pioneer, as one of his sources. As he puts it, “General Jimmy Doolittle was involved up to his ears in MJ 12; he was not a part of MJ 12.” According to John Lear his mother was very close to Gen. Doolittle, and in 1985, 1986, when John got interested in matters related to UFOs and Majestic 12, he asked his mother to enquire about it from Gen. Doolittle. The general confirmed the existence of MJ 12 but also said that he could not talk about it.

In his persuasive book [35] on the subject of JFK assassination and UFOs, Michael E. Salla Ph.D. has presented evidence that JFK was aware about UFOs from his interaction with James S. Forrestal, who was killed (in what was made to look like a suicide) because he threatened to reveal the truth about UFOs (and also I believe the Elite planned Korean war). In chapter 2 of his book Salla establishes that, as a young Congressman, JFK was able to get classified information on the famous 1947 UFO crash at Roswell. An army CIC (Counter Intelligence Corps) report to the effect is reproduced in the chapter on p 45. Therefore, JFK was aware of the extra-terrestrial origin of UFOs at a very young age.

When JFK became President he was aware that his predecessor Eisenhower had sought a report on the Roswell crash in his capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Staff, a report that had, it appears, been seen by JFK as a young Congressman at that time. At one stage when Eisenhower, as President of the U.S., sought information about Area 51, the now well known site where UFOs were kept, the CIA resisted. He had it conveyed to the CIA that if they did not provide the information he will simply order the Army to take over area 51.

JFK must have been aware of all this. On 28 June 1961, JFK sought a summary from the CIA director Allen Dulles on MJ 12. The one sentence letter (“I would like a brief summary from you at your earliest convenience”) had a subject title was longer than the sentence itself! The subject was: Review of MJ 12 Intelligence Operations as they relate to Cold War Psychological Warfare Plans. The image of this classified but leaked letter is reproduced by Salla on p 111 of his book. Thus letter has a date that coincides with the dates three other letters that were issued by JFK and sent to the Joint Chief of Staffs – these are the wellknown NSAMs 55-57 which placed the Cold War operations entirely in the hands of the Joint Chief of Staffs. Thus JFK took these operations away from the CIA and the CIA knew the exact import of all this. This was after the Bay of Pigs failure.

At the time these memoranda were written JFK had decided to get rid of Dulles et al and they knew it. By virtue of his position as Director CIA Dulles was still the head of MJ 12. According to author Mark Reibling’s book Wedge, cited by Salla, Angleton’s successors burnt 99% of his counter intelligence files. However, a CI officer, a colleague of Angleton’s rescued a highly important file from the fire and sent it to William Cooper on June 23, 1999 stating that the “document did not exist officially and has never been disclosed by the agency.” He also stated that the sensitive files “connect MJ 12 to JFK’s murder.” The file contained several letters/memoranda issued by Dulles. The cover page of the document has the date burnt out. Salla quotes (p 119):

As you must know Lancer (Kennedy’s Secret Service codename) has made some inquiries regarding our activities which we cannot allow. Please submit your views not later than October. Your action to this matter I critical to the continuance of the group.”

The document clearly reveals that JFK had put the very existence of MJ 12 in serious danger and that he cannot be allowed to gain information about the activities of MJ 12! The letter was certainly written after June 28, 1961 and since the opinion was sought not later than October 1961 the letter could have been written sometime during the three intervening months of July, August and September. On November 5, 1961, when the month of October had just ended, and the majority had agreed to eliminate JFK, Dulles responded to JFK’s letter of June 28, 1961. It had taken him over three months to reply and the reply did not reveal anything of importance. The letter of Nov 5, 1961 is reproduced by Salla on p114. Please note Dulles was to retire (forcibly) on November 29, 1961.

The partially burnt document appears to contain a series of MJ 12 drafts by Dulles. One of the most cryptic and sinister drafts reads as follows (Salla p 120):

Draft: Directive Regarding Project Enivronment – When conditions become non-conducive for growth in our environment and Washington cannot be influenced any further, the weather is lacking any precipitation – it should be wet.

The phrase it should be wet is interpreted as a directive to kill someone. Angleton would know the meaning of such a cryptic letter. It appears that Dulles was seeking the approval from six colleagues (including him would make it 7, giving a majority for a decision – the other 5 then need not be consulted). In Salla’s estimate, the seven likely members who agreed to the decision probably were Allen Dulles, Dr. Edward Teller, Gen. Marshall Carter, Gen. Curtis LeMay, Gen. Gordon Blake, Dr. Detlev Bronk and Dr. Jerome Hunsaker.

On September 20, 1963, JFK addressed the U.N. General Assembly. In his speech he stated (Salla p 196):

Finally, in a field where the United States and the Soviet Union have a special capacity – in regulation and exploration of space. I include among these possibilities a joint expedition to the moon.”

Khrushchev’s son was to reveal later that JFK had secretly proposed joint space and lunar missions to the Soviet premier.  In September 1963 JFK instructed CIA to release classified UFO files to NASA so that joint space programs with the Soviets could be carried out. How could this be allowed in view of the MJ 12 decision of October 1961 – it should be wet. So there was another reason to get rid of JFK.

It is important to remember that the independence of the MJ 12 from the President resulted from the recommendations of a Commission headed by Nelson Rockefeller. He headed the Advisory Committee on Government Organization set up by President Eisenhower by an Executive Order (10432) on January 24, 1953. At the time the loyal Rockefeller agent Allen Dulles was Director CIA. Rockefeller was responsible for giving MJ 12 independence from Presidential oversight. Eisenhower accepted the recommendations, much to his later regret. This is what provided the cover for the assassination of his successor JFK.

Treasury Dollar Bills

The Federal Reserve was set up in December 1913, several months before the planned World War I broke out. The U.S. constitution empowers none else other than the U.S. Treasury to issue its currency. The Federal Reserve Act handed over this power, in violation of the constitution, to the Satanic owners of the Federal Reserve can bring about inflation and deflation at will, bring about depressions and homelessness when they so desire, and manipulate and pressure U.S. administrations into fighting wars. The Federal Reserve is the curse that has blighted the Fate and fortune of America, and with it of the rest of the world over the past 100 years. JFK knew of the evil effects of this system, and in his time U.S. Treasury bills were printed, the only time this has been done in the 104 years since the Federal Reserve was set up. By printing U.S. Treasury notes JFK was attempting to take away the power of the international banking families to create fiat money and shackle his nation and the rest of the world. He, it appears, had planned to replace the Federal Reserve notes by U.S. Treasury bills rendering the international banking families powerless. The usurers assassinated Julius Caesar, Napoleon and JFK for the very same reason – they attempted to eliminate usury. This has been described and explained in a remarkable book by Stephen Mitford Goodson, a former director of the South African central bank [36].

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The Illuminati international banking families own the U.S. Federal Reserve, and by controlling the money line of the U.S., control its Congress, its judiciary, its media, its educational system, its executive and its agencies. Money control and mind control are the two keys to their strategy of bloodshed to obtain the end goal. Dean Henderson has established that members of these families are among the top ten stockholders in each of the top 500 corporations of the world [37].

“The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.”

These 500 corporations include the defence industry including the aerospace industry. These families have monopolised UFO research through their control of the CIA as well as ownership of the aerospace industry. They have created Israel as the epicentre of world “revolution” i.e. the centre from where wars for setting up the global slave state, with Jerusalem as its capital, will emanate. They control Israel. For a long time, the top secret Skunkworks division of Lockheed Martin was headed by Ben Rich.  John Lear has stated that Ben Rich was a Mossad agent who received the most classified information and then passed it onto Mossad, which passed it on to the Soviets [38]. These families and their subservient allies are behind every major upheaval and bloodshed, from the French Revolution to the Bolshevik Revolution, the two World Wars and the perpetual strife and terrorism in all continents today. They are relentless in the pursuit of their bloody goal and do not allow mankind a moment of respite. Through war they profit and enhance their control over mankind. A one world slave state with a reduced global population is their goal. Satanic practices and absolute dictatorship will prevail in this New World Order and all traditional religions –  the religions of Abraham and Moses, Christianity and Islam – will cease to exist. The international banking families will be the princes and rulers to whose whims, whatever is left of mankind, will bow. JFK constituted the most potent challenge ever to the evil program of these Satanic Illuminati international banking families and had to be eliminated with extreme prejudice.

Kevin Barrett Ph.D., author and editor of Veterans Today wrote on David Rockefeller’s death [39]:

David Rockefeller was such an important figure that he had to “give the nod” to the JFK assassination. On the night of November 21, 1963, Rockefeller’s right hand man and emissary John J. McCloy, along with J. Edgar Hoover and his “wife” Clyde Tolson, ultra-corrupt Vice President Lyndon Johnson, mafia hit man Jack Ruby, future president Richard M. Nixon, George Brown (of Brown and Root), and other Deep State kingpins gathered at mafia lynchpin Clint Murchison’s house in Dallas. Johnson emerged from the meeting to tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that “after tomorrow, those goddamn Kennedies will never embarrass me again.”

The JFK agenda was as follows:

What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children – not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women – not merely peace in all time but peace for all time.”

This is what scared the Illuminati Satanic brotherhood. And JFK almost succeeded. Today the world needs JFK more than ever.

 

References and Endnotes

[1] L. Fletcher Prouty: JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy; Skyhorse Publishing Inc., 2011 (first published 1996) pp 17,18

[2]   Ibid, p 60

[3]  Ibid, p 129

[4] David Talbot: Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years; New York Free Press, 2007; pp 47, 48

[5] James W. Douglas: JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters; Touchstone Simon & Schuster, 2008, p 14

[6] L. Fletcher Prouty: op cit, p 155

[7] James W. Douglas: op cit, p 87

[8] David Talbot: op cit, pp 163-167; the confrontation between JFK and the top military brass as well as CIA is described in these pages

[9] Ibid, p 171

[10] James W.Douglass: op cit,  p  382

[11] Ibid, p

[12] The speech can be seen at

https://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/DOPIN64xJUGRKgdHJ9NfgQ.aspx

[13] James W. Douglass: op cit, pp 24,25

[14] Ibid p xxii

[15] David Talbot: op cit,  p 172),

[16] Peter Dale Scott: Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1996, pp 254,255

[17] James W. Douglass: op cit, pp 59, 60

[18] Peter Dale Scott: op cit, p 255

[19] The interview may be seen on you tube with the written statement being read out by his son.  Antonio Veciana – Admissions and Revelations HD, Assassination and Archives and Research Centre; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY-psk_aPhU

[20] James W. Douglass: op cit, p141:

[21] Donald Gibson: Battling Wall Street: The Kennedy Presidency; Sheridan Square Press, p 54

[22] Ibid, p 76

[23] Paul Findley: “In Kennedy Assassination, Anyone But Mossad is Fair Game for U.S. Media” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 1992, p 26; https://www.wrmea.org/1992-march/speaking-out-in-kennedy-assassination-anyone-but-mossad-is-fair-game-for-u.s.-media.html

[24] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_van_Creveld

[25] Avner Cohen and William Burr: Kennedy, Dimona and the Nuclear Proliferation Problem 1961-1962; posted April 21, 2016,  https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb547-Kennedy-Dimona-and-the-Nuclear-Proliferation-Problem-1961-1962/

[26] Michael Collins Piper: Rothschild-Israeli Ties to JFK Assassination; November 21, 2013, http://americanfreepress.net/rothschild-link-to-jfk/

[27] Ibid

[28] Michael Collins Piper: Final Judgement: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy; American Free Press, 2005 printing, pp 85,86

[29] Ibid, p 138

[30] Dangerous Liaisons: Israel & The CIA; 3 Nov 2016; Andrew and Leslie Cockburn;  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqzvXCzXZg8

[31] John Lear – Israeli Mossad Did 9/11 and Assassinated JFK – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pC5JDLOm9g

This clip is part of a series of four-part interview given in 2008 by John Lear to the Project Camelot. Another set of a four-part interview was then given in 2017

[32] Video Rebel’s Blog: Israel Killed JFK and has Ruled America Ever Since

https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2014/11/22/israel-killed-jfk-and-has-ruled-america-ever-since/

[33] Mossad and the JFK Assassination:

http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/mossadandtheassassination.htm

[34] John Lear on Why Majestic 12 Group is Real https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRugJALguUc

 [35] Michael E. Salla: Kennedy’s Last Stand: Eisenhower, UFOs, MJ 12 & JFK’s Assassination; published by Exopolitics Institute, 2013

[36] Stephen Mitford Goodson: A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind; Black House Publishing Limited, 2014

[37] Dean Henderson: The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families: June 01, 2011, http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080
This article appears on numerous web sites and Dean Henderson also has his own web site. It has been taken from a book authored by Henderson. Dean HendersonBig Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network; Bridger House Publishing, 3rd Edition 2010 (first edition 2005)

[38] Ref. 31

[39] Kevin Barrett: Rockefeller Dies – Links to JFK Assassination Exposed! https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/03/20/rockefeller/

 

Advertisements

Asia Geopolitics and Military strategy

Middle East and Asia Geopolitics: Shift in Military Alliances?

 

Courtesy:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/shift-in-geopolitical-alliances/5611373

World War III with China

Rival Superpower Strategies: World War III with China

How It Might Actually Be Fought

[This piece has been adapted and expanded from Alfred W. McCoy’s new book, In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power.]

For the past 50 years, American leaders have been supremely confident that they could suffer military setbacks in places like Cuba or Vietnam without having their system of global hegemony, backed by the world’s wealthiest economy and finest military, affected. The country was, after all, the planet’s “indispensible nation,” as Secretary of State Madeleine Albright proclaimed in 1998 (and other presidents and politicians have insisted ever since). The U.S. enjoyed a greater “disparity of power” over its would-be rivals than any empire ever, Yale historian Paul Kennedy announced in 2002. Certainly, it would remain “the sole superpower for decades to come,” Foreign Affairs magazine assured us just last year.

During the 2016 campaign, candidate Donald Trump promised his supporters that “we’re gonna win with military… we are gonna win so much you may even get tired of winning.” In August, while announcing his decision to send more troops to Afghanistan, Trump reassured the nation: “In every generation, we have faced down evil, and we have always prevailed.” In this fast-changing world, only one thing was certain: when it really counted, the United States could never lose.

No longer.

The Trump White House may still be basking in the glow of America’s global supremacy but, just across the Potomac, the Pentagon has formed a more realistic view of its fading military superiority. In June, the Defense Department issued a major report titled on Risk Assessment in a Post-Primacy World, finding that the U.S. military “no longer enjoys an unassailable position versus state competitors,” and “it no longer can… automatically generate consistent and sustained local military superiority at range.” This sober assessment led the Pentagon’s top strategists to “the jarring realization that ‘we can lose.’” Increasingly, Pentagon planners find, the “self-image of a matchless global leader” provides a “flawed foun­dation for forward-looking defense strategy… under post-primacy conditions.” This Pentagon report also warned that, like Russia, China is “engaged in a deliberate program to demonstrate the limits of U.S. authority”; hence, Beijing’s bid for “Pacific primacy” and its “campaign to expand its control over the South China Sea.”

China’s Challenge

Indeed, military tensions between the two countries have been rising in the western Pacific since the summer of 2010. Just as Washington once used its wartime alliance with Great Britain to appropriate much of that fading empire’s global power after World War II, so Beijing began using profits from its export trade with the U.S. to fund a military challenge to its dominion over the waterways of Asia and the Pacific.

Some telltale numbers suggest the nature of the future great power competition between Washington and Beijing that could determine the course of the twenty-first century. In April 2015, for instance, the Department of Agriculture reported that the U.S. economy would grow by nearly 50% over the next 15 years, while China’s would expand by 300%, equaling or surpassing America’s around 2030.

Similarly, in the critical race for worldwide patents, American leadership in technological innovation is clearly on the wane. In 2008, the United States still held the number two spot behind Japan in patent applications with 232,000. China was, however, closing in fast at 195,000, thanks to a blistering 400% increase since 2000. By 2014, China actually took the lead in this critical category with 801,000 patents, nearly half the world’s total, compared to just 285,000 for the Americans.

With supercomputing now critical for everything from code breaking to consumer products, China’s Defense Ministry outpaced the Pentagon for the first time in 2010, launching the world’s fastest supercomputer, the Tianhe-1A. For the next six years, Beijing produced the fastest machine and last year finally won in a way that couldn’t be more crucial: with a supercomputer that had microprocessor chips made in China. By then, it also had the most supercomputers with 167 compared to 165 for the United States and only 29 for Japan.

Over the longer term, the American education system, that critical source of future scientists and innovators, has been falling behind its competitors. In 2012, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development tested half a million 15-year-olds worldwide. Those in Shanghai came in first in math and science, while those in Massachusetts, “a strong-performing U.S. state,” placed 20th in science and 27th in math. By 2015, America’s standing had declined to 25th in science and 39th in math.

But why, you might ask, should anybody care about a bunch of 15-year-olds with backpacks, braces, and attitude? Because by 2030, they will be the mid-career scientists and engineers determining whose computers survive a cyber attack, whose satellites evade a missile strike, and whose economy has the next best thing.

Rival Superpower Strategies

With its growing resources, Beijing has been laying claim to an arc of islands and waters from Korea to Indonesia long dominated by the U.S. Navy. In August 2010, after Washington expressed a “national interest” in the South China Sea and conducted naval exercises there to reinforce the claim, Beijing’s Global Times responded angrily that “the U.S.-China wrestling match over the South China Sea issue has raised the stakes in deciding who the real future ruler of the planet will be.”

Four years later, Beijing escalated its territorial claims to these waters, building a nuclear submarine facility on Hainan Island and accelerating its dredging of seven artificial atolls for military bases in the Spratly Islands. When the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled, in 2016, that these atolls gave China no territorial claim to the surrounding seas, Beijing’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the decision out of hand.

To meet China’s challenge on the high seas, the Pentagon began sending a succession of carrier groups on “freedom of navigation” cruises into the South China Sea. It also started shifting spare air and sea assets to a string of bases from Japan to Australia in a bid to strengthen its strategic position along the Asian littoral. Since the end of World War II, Washington has attempted to control the strategic Eurasian landmass from a network of NATO military bases in Europe and a chain of island bastions in the Pacific. Between the “axial ends” of this vast continent, Washington has, over the past 70 years, built successive layers of military power — air and naval bases during the Cold War and more recently a string of 60 drone bases stretching from Sicily to Guam.

Simultaneously, however, China has conducted what the Pentagon in 2010 called “a comprehensive transformation of its military” meant to prepare the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) “for extended-range power projection.” With the world’s “most active land-based ballistic and cruise missile program,” Beijing can target “its nuclear forces throughout… most of the world, including the continental United States.” Meanwhile, accurate missiles now provide the PLA with the ability “to attack ships, including aircraft carriers, in the western Pacific Ocean.” In emerging military domains, China has begun to contest U.S. dominion over cyberspace and space, with plans to dominate “the information spectrum in all dimensions of the modern battlespace.”

China’s army has by now developed a sophisticated cyberwarfare capacity through its Unit 61398 and allied contractors that “increasingly focus… on companies involved in the critical infrastructure of the United States — its electrical power grid, gas lines, and waterworks.” After identifying that unit as responsible for a series of intellectual property thefts, Washington took the unprecedented step, in 2013, of filing criminal charges against five active-duty Chinese cyber officers.

China has already made major technological advances that could prove decisive in any future war with Washington. Instead of competing across the board, Beijing, like many late adopters of technology, has strategically chosen key areas to pursue, particularly orbital satellites, which are a fulcrum for the effective weaponization of space. As early as 2012, China had already launched 14 satellites into “three kinds of orbits” with “more satellites in high orbits and… better anti-shielding capabilities than other systems.” Four years later, Beijing announced that it was on track to “cover the whole globe with a constellation of 35 satellites by 2020,” becoming second only to the United States when it comes to operational satellite systems.

Playing catch-up, China has recently achieved a bold breakthrough in secure communications. In August 2016, three years after the Pentagon abandoned its own attempt at full-scale satellite security, Beijing launched the world’s first quantum satellite that transmits photons, believed to be “invulnerable to hacking,” rather than relying on more easily compromised radio waves. According to one scientific report, this new technology will “create a super-secure communications network, potentially linking people anywhere.” China was reportedly planning to launch 20 of the satellites should the technology prove fully successful.

To check China, Washington has been building a new digital defense network of advanced cyberwarfare capabilities and air-space robotics. Between 2010 and 2012, the Pentagon extended drone operations into the exosphere, creating an arena for future warfare unlike anything that has gone before. As early as 2020, if all goes according to plan, the Pentagon will loft a triple-tier shield of unmanned drones reaching from the stratosphere to the exosphere, armed with agile missiles, linked by an expanded satellite system, and operated through robotic controls.

Weighing this balance of forces, the RAND Corporation recently released a study, War with China, predicting that by 2025

“China will likely have more, better, and longer-range ballistic missiles and cruise missiles; advanced air defenses; latest generation aircraft; quieter submarines; more and better sensors; and the digital communications, processing power, and C2 [cyber security] necessary to operate an integrated kill chain.”

In the event of all-out war, RAND suggested, the United States might suffer heavy losses to its carriers, submarines, missiles, and aircraft from Chinese strategic forces, while its computer systems and satellites would be degraded thanks to “improved Chinese cyberwar and ASAT [anti-satellite] capabilities.” Even though American forces would counterattack, their “growing vulnerability” means Washington’s victory would not be assured. In such a conflict, the think tank concluded, there might well be no “clear winner.”

Make no mistake about the weight of those words. For the first time, a top strategic think-tank, closely aligned with the U.S. military and long famous for its influential strategic analyses, was seriously contemplating a major war with China that the United States would not win.

World War III: Scenario 2030

The technology of space and cyberwarfare is so new, so untested, that even the most outlandish scenarios currently concocted by strategic planners may soon be superseded by a reality still hard to conceive. In a 2015 nuclear war exercise, the Air Force Wargaming Institute used sophisticated computer modeling to imagine “a 2030 scenario where the Air Force’s fleet of B-52s… upgraded with… improved standoff weapons” patrol the skies ready to strike. Simultaneously, “shiny new intercontinental ballistic missiles” stand by for launch. Then, in a bold tactical gambit, B-1 bombers with “full Integrated Battle Station (IBS) upgrade” slip through enemy defenses for a devastating nuclear strike.

That scenario was no doubt useful for Air Force planners, but said little about the actual future of U.S. global power. Similarly, the RAND War with China study only compared military capacities, without assessing the particular strategies either side might use to its advantage.

I might not have access to the Wargaming Institute’s computer modeling or RAND’s renowned analytical resources, but I can at least carry their work one step further by imagining a future conflict with an unfavorable outcome for the United States. As the globe’s still-dominant power, Washington must spread its defenses across all military domains, making its strength, paradoxically, a source of potential weakness. As the challenger, China has the asymmetric advantage of identifying and exploiting a few strategic flaws in Washington’s otherwise overwhelming military superiority.

For years, prominent Chinese defense intellectuals like Shen Dingli of Fudan University have rejected the idea of countering the U.S. with a big naval build-up and argued instead for “cyberattacks, space weapons, lasers, pulses, and other directed-energy beams.” Instead of rushing to launch aircraft carriers that “will be burned” by lasers fired from space, China should, Shen argued, develop advanced weapons “to make other command systems fail to work.” Although decades away from matching the full might of Washington’s global military, China could, through a combination of cyberwar, space warfare, and supercomputing, find ways to cripple U.S. military communications and thus blind its strategic forces. With that in mind, here’s one possible scenario for World War III:

It’s 11:59 p.m. on Thanksgiving Thursday in 2030. For months, tensions have been mounting between Chinese and U.S. Navy patrols in the South China Sea. Washington’s attempts to use diplomacy to restrain China have proven an embarrassing failure among long-time allies — with NATO crippled by years of diffident American support, Britain now a third-tier power, Japan functionally neutral, and other international leaders cool to Washington’s concerns after suffering its cyber-surveillance for so long. With the American economy diminished, Washington plays the last card in an increasingly weak hand, deploying six of its remaining eight carrier groups to the Western Pacific.

Instead of intimidating China’s leaders, the move makes them more bellicose. Flying from air bases in the Spratly Islands, their jet fighters soon begin buzzing U.S. Navy ships in the South China Sea, while Chinese frigates play chicken with two of the aircraft carriers on patrol, crossing ever closer to their bows.

Then tragedy strikes. At 4:00 a.m. on a foggy October night, the massive carrier USS Gerald Ford slices through aging Frigate-536 Xuchang, sinking the Chinese ship with its entire crew of 165.  Beijing demands an apology and reparations. When Washington refuses, China’s fury comes fast.

At the stroke of midnight on Black Friday, as cyber-shoppers storm the portals of Best Buy for deep discounts on the latest consumer electronics from Bangladesh, Navy personnel staffing the Space Surveillance Telescope at Exmouth, Western Australia, choke on their coffees as their panoramic screens of the southern sky suddenly blip to black. Thousands of miles away at the U.S. CyberCommand’s operations center in Texas, Air Force technicians detect malicious binaries that, though hacked anonymously into American weapons systems worldwide, show the distinctive digital fingerprints of China’s People’s Liberation Army.

In what historians will later call the “Battle of Binaries,” CyberCom’s supercomputers launch their killer counter-codes. While a few of China’s provincial servers do lose routine administrative data, Beijing’s quantum satellite system, equipped with super-secure photon transmission, proves impervious to hacking. Meanwhile, an armada of bigger, faster supercomputers slaved to Shanghai’s cyberwarfare Unit 61398 blasts back with impenetrable logarithms of unprecedented subtlety and sophistication, slipping into the U.S. satellite system through its antiquated microwave signals.

The first overt strike is one nobody at the Pentagon predicted. Flying at 60,000 feet above the South China Sea, several U.S. carrier-based MQ-25 Stingray drones, infected by Chinese “malware,” suddenly fire all the pods beneath their enormous delta wingspans, sending dozens of lethal missiles plunging harmlessly into the ocean, effectively disarming those formidable weapons.

Determined to fight fire with fire, the White House authorizes a retaliatory strike. Confident their satellite system is impenetrable, Air Force commanders in California transmit robotic codes to a flotilla of X-37B space drones, orbiting 250 miles above the Earth, to launch their Triple Terminator missiles at several of China’s communication satellites. There is zero response.

In near panic, the Navy orders its Zumwalt-class destroyers to fire their RIM-174 killer missiles at seven Chinese satellites in nearby geostationary orbits. The launch codes suddenly prove inoperative.

As Beijing’s viruses spread uncontrollably through the U.S. satellite architecture, the country’s second-rate supercomputers fail to crack the Chinese malware’s devilishly complex code. With stunning speed, GPS signals crucial to the navigation of American ships and aircraft worldwide are compromised.

Across the Pacific, Navy deck officers scramble for their sextants, struggling to recall long-ago navigation classes at Annapolis. Steering by sun and stars, carrier squadrons abandon their stations off the China coast and steam for the safety of Hawaii.

An angry American president orders a retaliatory strike on a secondary Chinese target, Longpo Naval Base on Hainan Island. Within minutes, the commander of Andersen Air Base on Guam launches a battery of super-secret X-51 “Waverider” hypersonic missiles that soar to 70,000 feet and then streak across the Pacific at 4,000 miles per hour — far faster than any Chinese fighter or air-to-air missile. Inside the White House situation room the silence is stifling as everyone counts down the 30 short minutes before the tactical nuclear warheads are to slam into Longpo’s hardened submarine pens, shutting down Chinese naval operations in the South China Sea. Midflight, the missiles suddenly nose-dive into the Pacific.

In a bunker buried deep beneath Tiananmen Square, President Xi Jinping’s handpicked successor, Li Keqiang, even more nationalistic than his mentor, is outraged that Washington would attempt a tactical nuclear strike on Chinese soil. When China’s State Council wavers at the thought of open war, the president quotes the ancient strategist Sun Tzu:

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.”

Amid applause and laughter, the vote is unanimous. War it is!

Almost immediately, Beijing escalates from secret cyberattacks to overt acts. Dozens of China’s next-generation SC-19 missiles lift off for strikes on key American communications satellites, scoring a high ratio of kinetic kills on these hulking units. Suddenly, Washington loses secure communications with hundreds of military bases. U.S. fighter squadrons worldwide are grounded. Dozens of F-35 pilots already airborne are blinded as their helmet-mounted avionic displays go black, forcing them down to 10,000 feet for a clear view of the countryside. Without any electronic navigation, they must follow highways and landmarks back to base like bus drivers in the sky.

Midflight on regular patrols around the Eurasian landmass, two-dozen RQ-180 surveillance drones suddenly become unresponsive to satellite-transmitted commands. They fly aimlessly toward the horizon, crashing when their fuel is exhausted. With surprising speed, the United States loses control of what its Air Force has long called the “ultimate high ground.”

With intelligence flooding the Kremlin about crippled American capacity, Moscow, still a close Chinese ally, sends a dozen Severodvinsk-class nuclear submarines beyond the Arctic Circle bound for permanent, provocative patrols between New York and Newport News. Simultaneously, a half-dozen Grigorovich-class missile frigates from Russia’s Black Sea fleet, escorted by an undisclosed number of attack submarines, steam for the western Mediterranean to shadow the U.S. Sixth fleet.

Within a matter of hours, Washington’s strategic grip on the axial ends of Eurasia — the keystone to its global dominion for the past 85 years — is broken. In quick succession, the building blocks in the fragile architecture of U.S. global power start to fall.

Every weapon begets its own nemesis. Just as musketeers upended mounted knights, tanks smashed trench works, and dive bombers sank battleships, so China’s superior cybercapability had blinded America’s communication satellites that were the sinews of its once-formidable military apparatus, giving Beijing a stunning victory in this war of robotic militaries. Without a single combat casualty on either side, the superpower that had dominated the planet for nearly a century is defeated in World War III.

Alfred W. McCoy, a TomDispatch regular, is the Harrington professor of history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is the author of the now-classic book The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, which probed the conjuncture of illicit narcotics and covert operations over 50 years, and the just-published In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power (Dispatch Books) from which this piece is adapted.

Courtesy:

Psychoanalyst: Trump is ‘depressed’

By Negar Asadi

Psychoanalyst: Trump is ‘depressed’

September 26, 2017

TEHRAN – A prominent Iranian psychoanalyst says U.S. President Donald Trump is “dangerous” because he has a “lot of power” and is “depressed”.

“A person who is depressed and deeply sad can easily use his power as an instrument in quasi-suicidal way,” Modjtaba Sadria told Tehran Times in an interview on Tuesday.

He added, “Trump is not dangerous because he is crazy.”

“When you look at him, you don’t see expression of joy in that man. Of course you see the expression of arrogance, but you don’t see the expression of joy. And that is the most dangerous aspect of Trump.”

He added that a depressed person who has power can cause “bad damages”.

“Understanding Trump requires understanding of three persons. One person is the one who sits in the Oval Office. Another is the person who has grown as a main capitalist in capitalism of the U.S., who is a manager of a business. The third person is a human being who has his own deformations, trauma and psychological problems,” the expert stated.

Sadria said as a person who sits in the Oval Office, Trump cannot do whatever he likes.

“The U.S. is an advanced capitalistic society and interests in that society are very well organized and there is a federal state there which is extremely articulated as a solid foundation. So, the structure of the state apparatus of the U.S. prevents Trump from doing whatever he wants.”

“Understanding Trump requires understanding of three persons. One person is the one who sits in the Oval Office. Another is the person who has grown as a main capitalist in capitalism of the U.S., who is a manager of a business. The third person is a human being who has his own deformations, trauma and psychological problems,” the expert says.

The scholar added that Trump has to speak in line with the interests of the U.S. and has to protect those interests even during his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“Because those interests are organized and Trump, or whoever that sits at the Oval Office, cannot radically transform them.”

And as a person who has “grown as a main capitalist” he “behaves basically as an erratic, successful and egocentric businessman”, Sadria stated.

“Any power, including in the area of business, requires a psychological capacity to deal with it which Trump does not have. He has not the mental capacity to deal with his success.”

Sadria said that the U.S. president is like the “new rich” who has the financial capital but lacks appropriate “cultural capital”.

“So, I think Trump is a person who cannot cope with his success.”

He also said that Trump as an individual and a human being is a very sad person.

‘Iran will be stronger if U.S. quits nuclear deal’

Sadria also said that Iran will be stronger in the Middle East region if the U.S. quits the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and the 5+1 group.

The U.S. will have much less power in the region if it withdraws from the nuclear agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, he said.

In his speech at the UN General Assembly last week, Trump made the harshest attack against the July 2015 nuclear deal, saying it was an “embarrassment” to the U.S. and hinted that he may not recertify the agreement when it comes up for a mid-October deadline.

Courtesy:

http://www.tehrantimes.com/news/417139/Psychoanalyst-Trump-is-depressed

America , China, Russia and War

Laughing on the Way to Armageddon — Paul Craig Roberts

The United States shows the world such a ridiculous face that the world laughs at us.

The latest spin on “Russia stole the election” is that Russia used Facebook to influence the election. The NPR women yesterday were breathless about it.

We have been subjected to ten months of propaganda about Trump/Putin election interference and still not a scrap of evidence. It is past time to ask an unasked question: If there were evidence, what is the big deal? All sorts of interest groups try to influence election outcomes including foreign governments. Why is it OK for Israel to influence US elections but not for Russia to do so? Why do you think the armament industry, the energy industry, agribusiness, Wall Street and the banks, pharmaceutical companies, etc., etc., supply the huge sum of money to finance election campaigns if their intent is not to influence the election? Why do editorial boards write editorials endorsing one candidate and damning another if they are not influencing the election?

What is the difference between influencing the election and influencing the government? Washington is full of lobbyists of all descriptions, including lobbyists for foreign governments, working round the clock to influence the US government. It is safe to say that the least represented in the government are the citizens themselves who don’t have any lobbyists working for them.

The orchestrated hysteria over “Russian influence” is even more absurd considering the reason Russia allegedly interfered in the election. Russia favored Trump because he was the peace candidate who promised to reduce the high tensions with Russia created by the Obama regime and its neocon nazis—Hillary Clinton, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power. What’s wrong with Russia preferring a peace candidate over a war candidate? The American people themselves preferred the peace candidate. So Russia agreed with the electorate.

Those who don’t agree with the electorate are the warmongers—the military/security complex and the neocon nazis. These are democracy’s enemies who are trying to overturn the choice of the American people. It is not Russia that disrespects the choice of the American people; it is the utterly corrupt Democratic National Committee and its divisive Identity Politics, the military/security complex, and the presstitute media who are undermining democracy.

I believe it is time to change the subject. The important question is who is it that is trying so hard to convince Americans that Russian influence prevails over us?

Do the idiots pushing this line realize how impotent this makes an alleged “superpower” look. How can we be the hegemonic power that the Zionist neocons say we are when Russia can decide who is the president of the United States?

The US has a massive spy state that even intercepts the private cell phone conversations of the Chancellor of Germany, but his massive spy organization is unable to produce one scrap of evidence that the Russians conspired with Trump to steal the presidential election from Hillary. When will the imbeciles realize that when they make charges for which no evidence can be produced they make the United States look silly, foolish, incompetent, stupid beyond all belief?

Countries are supposed to be scared of America’s threat that “we will bomb you into the stone age,” but the President of Russia laughs at us. Putin recently described the complete absence of any competence in Washington:

It is difficult to talk to people who confuse Austria and Australia. But there is nothing we can do about this; this is the level of political culture among the American establishment. As for the American people, America is truly a great nation if the Americans can put up with so many politically uncivilized people in their government.”

These words from Putin were devastating, because the world understands that they are accurate.

 

Consider the idiot Nikki Haley, appointed by Trump in a fit of mindlessness as US Ambassador to the United Nations. This stupid person is forever shaking her fist at the Russians while mouthing yet another improbable accusation. She might want to read Mario Puzo’s book, The Godfather. Everyone knows the movie, but if memory serves somewhere in the book Puzo reflects on the practice of the irate American motorist who shakes a fist and gives the bird to other drivers. What if the driver receiving the insult is a Mafia capo? Does the idiot shaking his fist know who he is accosting? No. Does the moron know that the result might be a brutal beating or death? No.

 

Does the imbecile Nikki Haley understand what can be the result of her inability to control herself? No. Every knowledgeable person I know wonders if Trump appointed the imbecile Nikki Haley US ambassador to the world for the purpose of infuriating the Russians.

Ask Napoleon and the German Wehrmacht the consequence of infuriating the Russians.

After 16 years the US “superpower” has been unable to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban, who have no air force, no Panzer divisions, no worldwide intelligence service, and the crazed US government in Washington is courting war with Russia and China and North Korea and Iran.

The American people are clearly out to lunch in their insouciance. Americans are fighting among themselves over “civil war” statues, while “their’ government invites nuclear armageddon.

The United States has an ambassador to the world who shows no signs of intelligence, who behaves as if she is Mike Tyson or Bruce Lee to the 5th power, and who is the total antithesis of a diplomat. What does this tell about the United States?

It reveals that the US is in the Roman collapse stage when the emperor appoints horses to the Senate.

The United States has a horse, an uncivilized horse, as its diplomat to the world. The Congress and executive branch are also full of horses and horse excrement. The US government is completely devoid of intelligence. There is no sign of intelligence anywhere in the U.S. government. Of or morality. As Hugo Chavez said: Satan is there; you can smell the sulphur.

America is a joke with nuclear weapons, the prime danger to life on earth.

How can this danger be corralled?

The American people would have to realize that they are being led to their deaths by the Zionist neocon nazis who, together with the military/security complex and Wall Street, control US foreign policy, by the complicity of Europe and Great Britain desperate to retain their CIA subsidies, and by the harlots that comprise the Western media.

Are Americans capable of comprehending this? Only a few have escaped The Matrix.

The consequence is that America is being locked into conflict with Russia and China. There is no possibility whatsoever of Washington invading either country, much less both, so war would be nuclear.

Do the American people want Washington to bring us this result? If not, why are the American people sitting there sucking their thumbs, doing nothing? Why are Europe and Great Britain sitting there permitting the unfolding of nuclear armageddon? Who murdered the peace movement?

The World and the American people need desperately to rein in the warmonger United States, or the world will cease to exist.

An International Court To Preserve Life On Earth needs to be assembled. The US government and the war interests it serves need to be indicted and prosecuted and disarmed before their evil destroys life on earth.

September 8, 2017

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/09/08/laughing-way-armageddon-paul-craig-roberts/

“Newspeak” and the Duplicity of Mainstream Journalism

“Newspeak” and the Duplicity of Mainstream Journalism

Julian Rose

December 22, 2016

We are faced by a shocking fact these days: the profession of journalism, and I speak of mainstream media journalism, has descended into truly toxic levels of printed and broadcast disinformation. One can now virtually count on the fact that what is being said on any topic of political significance, will be a carefully scripted trotting-out of government and corporate propaganda. 

That is not journalism. That is what George Orwell called ‘Newspeak’.

It is a dangerous game which these news hacks are playing. They are witnessing one event and describing it as quite another event. Let me amplify this by looking at the stories emanating out of the Middle East.

It must be obvious to most of us by now that Russia, via Putin, is being held responsible for pretty much everything which is no longer working well for Western engineered neoliberal/neocon globalism. In fact, the stream of accusations against Putin’s Russia have descended into near or actual farce, due mainly to the fact that they are not backed by any factual evidence. We are all simply supposed to ‘know’ that Mr Evil is at it again and that the West must ready itself to take action against his ‘tyrannical activities’.

Aleppo: BBC reports that returning pro Assad Syrian army troops are raping and murdering the civilian population of this once beautiful city in Northern Syria. That thousands are trying to flee the massacre going on night and day at the hands of Assad’s army, supported by Russia and Iran. That a systematic bombardment of the citizens of West Aleppo is being perpetrated by the liberating Syrian army. That children are being killed in schools and that all this is being done with cold blooded ruthlessness at the hands of the liberators.

You’ve seen this sort of ‘journalism’. It is based on fictitious information concocted and spread about by paid-off insiders, hired to tell lies at ten a minute. They are there to protect the geopolitical interests of the West. As if to officially rubber stamp this fact, the US Senate recently introduced a bill attempting to ban any story line which might contradict such ‘official’ version of events. Especially those surrounding the defeat of ISIS and the liberation of Aleppo which had been occupied – and virtually starved out – by ISIS terrorists for the past four years.

Attempts to silence truth are a direct attack on free speech. And such attacks are endemic in Westminster and Washington, as we have long been aware. But what we have been less focused on is the fact that mainstream media journalists are one hundred percent complicit. They are equally as worthy of the title ‘criminals’ as the editors who pay them to lie and the politicians who use these lies to further their ambitions.

I strongly doubt that any BBC, or other mainstream Western journalist, has carried out an in-depth investigation in Aleppo during the past two weeks. They don’t have to. The propaganda machine works best when nobody looks the reality in the eye. They are simply puppets, singing the hymns that NATO, the EU and USA wants the world to hear.

What has just happened in Aleppo is actually a disarmingly opposite reality. The Syrian national army has completed its recapture of the town. Supported by Russia and Iran, it has finally driven out the bloodcurdling terrorist executioners who had held thousands of terrified Syrian citizens hostage and in fear of their lives. The liberating army has brought food and has reconnected  disconnected drinking water supplies. It is providing medical services to the sick and wounded and busing others out of still active danger zones. It is being greeted with relief and tears of joy.

While, in comparison with the West, Russia has emerged as a relative powerhouse of studied diplomacy, as well as an effective military force in directly combating the US and UK’s gruesome hegemony.

ISIS, let us not fail to reveal, had even bombarded the people of Aleppo in their own homes, as a deliberate ploy so as to directly accuse Russia and Syria of engaging in these horrors. Western sponsored NGO’s are also complicit in inverting such news horror stories to sound like the evil is being perpetrated by President Asad’s national army. There is no end to the attempts being made to  distort and reverse the truth.

Now, let’s switch for a moment to that other closely related story of lies and deceit called ‘Fake News’. And, lo and behold, The gods of what is brazenly called ‘serious news’ (the mainstream media empire) are suddenly spooked by the fact that they might be loosing control over their people. That the feast of lies is not being absorbed as readily as before and that a significant number of those still able to think are turning over to alternative sources of information, like this one, in search of something plausible.

Well, well, this is clearly something that must not be allowed to happen! Let’s brand these clandestine truth seeking sites ‘Fake News’ outlets, spreading false propaganda and lies amongst our audiences! Let’s outlaw freedom of speech – err, I mean fake news – and impeach those who defie us. Yes, and now we ‘know’ Russia hacked into the US elections let’s try and get the West on a  serious war footing and  kick NATO into action against these anti Western infidels!

So what I have discovered concerning what actually occurred in Aleppo is now Fake News, and because I’m telling fake news I’m in danger of being criminalized and held up as a traitor of mainstream ‘serious’ news and no doubt my Country. Don’t worry, I’ve been on the front lines for years fighting the likes of Monsanto, Tesco and the European Union, and I’m not about to run and hide. .

In a heightened state of outrage a few days ago, I contributed the following comment to a discussion on fake news in The Guardian:

“You have just been reading a fake news column. Mainstream media = Fake News. It is under the unbending thumb of corporate control – and thus editors of papers, such as this one, are tools of a system that will only allow into print that which is expurgated and rid of any attempt to tell the truth, rather than the ‘news-speak’ acceptable to the status quo. End of story.”

And somewhat to my surprise it was not moderated out of existence. It received support and dissent, but the support considerably outperformed the dissent. That’s interesting.

Please do take the time to click on the below link and watch the footage put together by ‘UK Column News’. It stands out like a beacon of light amidst the sea of darkness surrounding the issues I have described above.

Real journalism can now only be found on discerning alternative media sites. Please note that I said ‘discerning’. Main stream journalists who knowingly distort the truth, especially in life and death situations, should be considered as directly complicit in crimes against humanity.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-16th-december-2016-aleppo-justice-fake-news

Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer, actor, international activist and President of The International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside. He is the author of two acclaimed titles: Changing Course for Life and In Defense of Life upon which further information can be found at www.julianrose.info